Targeting read across 12 TrafficJunky campaigns by country, device, source, creative and landing.

TrafficJunky test: targeting read

12 campaigns, 4 countries (US, CA, AU, UK) by 3 device types, same 5 creatives, voice landing. Window June 16 to 17, 2026.

Spend
$547
Impressions
9.1M
Clicks
1,807
Registrations
43
Paid conv.
0
Blended CTR
0.020%

Bottom line

1. By country

CountrySpendImprClicksCTR%Regs$/regReg/click%Verdict
Canada$1813.43M7550.022025$7.263.31Top
UK$1712.79M5000.017911$15.592.20Solid 2nd
US$1832.84M5420.01917$26.171.29Weak
Australia$1136K100.0280n/a0No inventory
Canada
$7.26
UK
$15.59
US
$26.17

Cost per registration, shorter is better. Canada wins on both volume and intent (clickers convert at 3.31%, more than double US). US drew clicks but they converted at half Canada's rate. AU had almost no inventory under the targeting, so it cannot be judged.

2. By device / OS

DeviceSpendImprClicksCTR%Regs$/regReg/click%Verdict
Android$1823.96M9010.022822$8.292.44Best scale + cost
iOS$1843.92M4410.011311$16.752.49Expensive clicks
PC (Win+Mac)$1801.22M4650.038010$18.002.15High CTR, low volume
Android
$8.29
iOS
$16.75
PC (Win+Mac)
$18.00

Cost per registration, shorter is better. Android delivered both the most volume and the cheapest registration. iOS had the same impressions as Android but half the clicks (lowest CTR), so its clicks are scarce and pricey. PC clicks best per impression but inventory is limited (1.2M vs 3.9M on mobile).

3. By source / site

SiteImprClicksCTR%RegsNote
Pornhub8.47M16200.01914296% of delivery
Youporn340K1110.03261High CTR, tiny volume
Redtube242K640.02640High CTR, tiny volume
Tube829K70.02440Negligible

We did not restrict placements, so TrafficJunky pushed 96 percent of everything to Pornhub (42 of 43 registrations). The smaller tubes show higher CTR (0.026 to 0.033 vs 0.019) but on tiny volume. The signal is weak, yet worth a dedicated budget test rather than letting TJ concentrate all spend on Pornhub.

4. Best creative

CreativeCreatorCTR%RegsReg/click%Note
Cantgetenough (anchor)Miss Alexa0.02681.7Best CTR
CallMeBabyYeyeloba0.0198102.8Most regs
CallMeNowAlexis Mucci0.0175103.2Best intent
RingMeNowKazumi0.017992.8Solid
CallMeLateNightLisa Daniels0.018461.8Weakest of voice

The anchor (a plain explicit creative) wins on clicks. The new call-CTA creatives win on registration rate, but that is most likely ad-to-landing message match (call ad to call landing), not raw creative strength. Treat as directional.

5. By landing

RankLandingClicksRegsReg/click%Verdict
1v5529163.0Top
2v3622142.3Most clicks
3v1491132.7Close 2nd on rate
v5
3.0%
v1
2.7%
v3
2.3%

Click-to-registration rate, taller is better. Each campaign was assigned one of three landings (v5 / v3 / v1). v5 led on both registration count and click-to-registration rate. v3 pulled the most clicks but converted them at the lowest rate, and v1 sat close behind v5 on rate. The spread is small and the landings ran across different geo and device mixes, so read this as directional.

6. Continued campaign: Canada / Android Mobile (final)

The single most efficient cell from the test above. We kept it running solo from June 16 to 19, 2026, then stopped it. Final numbers below, same TrafficJunky source as the test for a like-for-like read.

Spend
$485
Impressions
12.4M
Clicks
2,749
CTR
0.022%
Regs (Everflow)
58
$/reg (Everflow)
$8.36
CreativeCreatorImprClicksCTR%Regs (TJ)Verdict
Cantgetenough (anchor)Miss Alexa3.26M9420.02929Best CTR + most regs
CallYourAiGirlSavannah Bond3.45M6440.01913Most impressions
RingMeNowKazumi1.25M2550.0209Solid
CallMeBabyYeyeloba1.91M4160.0228Mid
CallMeNowAlexis Mucci1.00M1850.0186Lowest

Miss Alexa (the anchor explicit creative) was the clear winner again: best CTR (0.029%) and the most registrations (29). Savannah pulled the most impressions but at a lower CTR. Per-creative registrations are TrafficJunky; the campaign total is higher because TJ does not attribute every impression to a specific ad.

TrafficJunky vs Everflow

SourceRegistrationsCost per registration
TrafficJunky72$6.74
Everflow (source of truth)58$8.36

Why TrafficJunky and Everflow differ (now fixed)

7. 11 campaigns vs the one we kept (Canada / Android)

Metric11 campaigns combinedOur CA / Android
Campaigns111
Impressions7,598,61412,189,682 1.6x
Clicks1,4552,719 1.9x
CTR0.019%0.022% higher
Registrations3058 1.9x
Paid conversions00
Spend$486.17$485.20
Cost per registration$16.21$8.37 ~2x cheaper
GeoUS, CA, UK, AUCanada
DevicesiOS, Android, PCAndroid

Same budget (~$485). Green marks where the single kept campaign beats all 11 combined.

Caveats. Sections 1 to 5 cover the 12-campaign test (June 16 to 17, 2026): 43 registrations total and 0 paid, so country, device and landing differences are directional trends, not hard statistics. Section 6 covers the continued Canada / Android campaign (June 16 to 19, 2026). Traffic and per-creative figures are from TrafficJunky; registration counts and cost per registration are reconciled against Everflow, which is the source of truth.